






 |
Origin, development and definition of
organic farming
Origin and development
of organic farming, and the development of standards
The emergence of a new kind of farming: different approaches
Organic farming is the outcome of theory and practice since the
early years of the 20th century, involving a variety of alternative
methods of agricultural production, mainly in northern Europe.
There have been three important movements:
| · |
Biodynamic
agriculture, which
appeared in Germany under the inspiration of Rudolf Steiner; |
| · |
Organic
farming, which originated
in England on the basis of the theories developed by Albert Howard
in his Agricultural Testament (1940); |
| · |
Biological
agriculture, which
was developed in Switzerland by Hans-Peter Rusch and Hans Müller. |
Despite some differences of emphasis, the common feature of all
these movements, which are the source of some of the terms protected
by Community rules, is to stress the essential link between farming
and nature, and to promote respect for natural equilibria. They
distance themselves from the interventionist approach to farming,
which maximises yields through the use of various kinds of synthetic
products.
Despite the vitality of these movements, organic farming remained
undeveloped in Europe for many years.
Development of organic farming
Throughout the 1950s, the main aim of farming was to achieve
a major improvement in productivity so as to
satisfy immediate needs for food and raise the European
Community's rate of self-sufficiency. In the circum-stances,
organic farming was obviously unlikely to be
viewed very favourably.
By the end of the 1960s, however, and especially in the 1970s,
organic farming came to the forefront in response to the emerging
awareness of environmental conservation issues. New associations
grew up, involving
producers, consumers and others interested in ecology and a lifestyle
more in tune with nature. These organisations draw up their own
specifications, with rules governing production methods.
It was in the 1980s, however, that organic farming really took
off, when the new production method continued to develop, along
with consumer interest in its products, not only in most European
countries, but also in the United States, Canada, Australia and
Japan. There was a major increase in the number of producers,
and new initiatives got under way for processing and marketing
organic products.
This situation conducive to the development of organic farming
was very largely due to consumers' strong concern to be supplied
with wholesome, environment-friendly products. At the same time,
the public authorities
were gradually recognising organic farming, including it among
their research topics and adopting specific legislation (e.g.
in Austria, France and Denmark). Some Member States also grant
national or regional subsidies to organic farmers.
However, despite all these efforts, organic farming was still
hampered by lack of clarity: consumers were not always sure about
what was really covered by organic farming, and the restrictions
it implied. The reasons for the confusion lay, among other things,
in the existence of a number of different "schools"
or "philosophies", the lack of harmonised terminology,
the non-standard presentation of products and the tendency to
blur the distinctions between concepts such as organic, natural,
wholesome and so on. The situation was not helped by cases of
fraudulent use of labelling referring to organic methods.
Definition of
organic farming
To define the concept
of organic farming, we may refer to the definition developed
by the Codex Alimentarius, on the basis of contributions from
experts from all over the world. According to the Codex, organic
farming
involves holistic production management systems (for crops and
livestock) emphasising the use of management practices in preference
to the use of off-farm inputs. This is accomplished by using,
where possible, cultural, biological and mechanical methods in
preference to synthetic materials.
The Codex guidelines specify that an organic production system
is designed to:
| · |
"enhance
biological diversity within the whole system; |
| · |
increase
soil biological activity; |
| · |
maintain long-term
soil fertility; |
| · |
recycle wastes
of plant and animal origin in order to return nutrients to the
land, thus minimising the use of non-renewable resources; |
| · |
rely on renewable
resources in locally organised agricultural systems; |
| · |
promote the healthy
use of soil, water and air as well as minimise all forms of pollution
thereto that may result from agricultural practices; |
| · |
handle agricultural
products with emphasis on careful processing methods in order
to maintain the organic integrity and vital qualities of the
product at all stages; |
| · |
become established
on any existing farm through a period of conversion, the appropriate
length of which is determined by site-specific factors such as
the history of the land, and type of crops and livestock to be
produced". |
Organic livestock farming is based
on the principle of a close link between the animals and the
soil. The need for a link with the soil requires animals to have
free access to outside areas for exercise, and also implies that
their feed should be not only organic, but preferably
produced on the farm. This sector of organic farming is, moreover,
very strictly regulated by provisions on animal welfare and veterinary
care.
The objectives of organic farming are identical whether we consider
crop products or animal products: they comprise the application
of production methods that do not damage the environment, more
respectful use of the countryside, concern for animal welfare
and the achievement of high-quality agricultural products.
As these objectives are not easily quantifiable, the best way
of pursuing them in practice so as to draw a clear distinction
between organic and conventional farming was to codify acceptable
procedures. This was done first through private specifications,
then through official rules or guidelines at national or international
level.
Rules governing organic production on farms
Livestock production
Part B of Annex I to
Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91, as amended on 19 July 1999 by Regulation
(EC) No 1804/1999, lays down minimum rules for organic livestock
production. The Member States may adopt stricter rules, under
Article 12 of Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91, concerning the animals
and animal products produced on their territory.
The general principles applicable to organic livestock production
require recognition of the interdependence between animals and
the soil; consequently, landless production is not an option.
As organic stockfarming is a land-related activity, livestock
must have access to a
free-range area and the number of animals per unit of area must
be limited.
The principle of separation requires all livestock on one and
the same production unit to be reared in accordance with the
rules governing organic production. Exceptions to this requirement
cannot be authorised unless proper measures are taken to ensure
that there can be no
confusion between organic and conventional production.
Part B of Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 also lays down
rules on the conversion period and the origin of the animals.
There are two aspects to conversion: the conversion of the land
associated with livestock production, and the conversion of the
livestock.
When herds are constituted, the breed of animal must be carefully
chosen so that the animals are adapted to their environment and
resistant to certain diseases. Livestock must come from holdings
that comply with the rules governing organic farming, and must
be reared in
accordance with those rules throughout their lives.
Part B also lays down rules on feed. Livestock must be fed on
organic feedingstuffs, preferably produced on the holding. Feed
should be primarily natural, which means that the feeding of
young mammals must be based on natural milk for a minimum period
laid down in Annex I. Precise rules are laid down on the composition
of the daily diet and the raw materials and other substances
used for animal feed.
Disease prevention and veterinary treatment must concentrate
mainly on prevention. As well as choosing appropriate breeds
of animals, the measures to be applied concern animal husbandry
practices to encourage resistance to disease, the use of high-quality
feed, and ensuring an appropriate density of livestock.
If disease occurs despite all these preventive measures, priority
should be given to natural treatments (e.g. phytotherapeutic
and homeopathic) rather than to antibiotics and allopathic veterinary
medicines, which may
leave residues. However, allopathic veterinary medicinal products
or antibiotics may be used under certain conditions if they are
essential to the animal's recovery. The use of substances such
as hormones to stimulate growth or to control reproduction is
categorically prohibited.
Animal welfare provisions subject certain practices, such as
tail-docking, cutting of teeth, trimming of beaks and dehorning,
to authorisation, which is granted only where necessary to ensure
the safety, hygiene, health or welfare of the animals. It is
forbidden as a rule to keep
livestock tethered, and general housing conditions must meet
the animals' physiological and behavioural needs. Very strict
standards are laid down for buildings. Transport of livestock
must be carried out with due consideration for the animals' welfare,
and in such a way as to
limit stress.
Beekeeping: a special case
Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 also applies to beekeeping, which
is a very special branch of production. Consequently, specific
rules are laid down for this activity, in part C of Annex I.
Two main principles should be stressed:
| · |
For beekeeping,
the conversion period is only one year; |
| · |
The siting of
apiaries is strictly controlled. Nectar and pollen sources available
over a three-kilometre radius around the apiary sites must consist
essentially of organically produced crops or crops treated with
low-environmental-impact methods. Apiaries must also be far enough
away from any non-agricultural production source that could lead
to contamination (e.g. urban centres, waste dumps, waste incinerators,
etc.). Member States have the option of prohibiting the production
of organic honey in certain regions or areas that do not meet
these conditions. |
Rules on processing organic
agricultural products into foodstuffs
Rules on processing
are laid down in Article 5 and in Annex VI to the Regulation.
Community rules strike a balance between consumer demand for
products that are as natural as possible, the need for a sufficiently
wide choice of food presented under the "organic" label
and the technological constraints of processing.
Consequently, while Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 does not totally
exclude ingredients of non-agricultural origin (food additives,
flavourings, water and salt, micro-organism preparations and
minerals), it strictly
limits their use; the same applies to processing aids essential
to the preparation of foodstuffs from agricultural products of
organic origin. Parts A and B of Annex VI to Regulation (EEC)
No 2092/91 contain lists
of the substances authorised in the processing of organic products.
In addition to these restrictions, Article 5 prohibits the use
of genetically modified organisms and treatments involving the
use of ionising radiation. Moreover, in order to prevent fraud,
an ingredient obtained according to organic methods may not be
present together with the
same ingredient obtained according to conventional methods.
The use of ingredients of agricultural origin produced by conventional
methods is limited to certain percentages, and is conditional
on the organic ingredient not being available. The ingredients
concerned are, in principle, listed in part C of Annex VI, but
the Member States may also issue national authorisations.
Labelling and
the Community organic farming logo
Labelling
Labelling and advertising may refer to organic production methods
only where they make it clear that the information relates to
a method of agricultural production. The product concerned must
comply with the provisions of Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91. Moreover,
the operator must be subject to the inspection measures laid
down in the Regulation, and the name and/or code number of the
inspection authority must be indicated.
The rules on indications referring to organic production methods
stipulate the minimum percentage of agricultural ingredients
that must be of organic origin.
Labelling and advertising of a food product may bear indications
referring to organic production methods in the sales description
only where at least 95% of the ingredients of agricultural origin
are organic. Food
products may thus contain up to 5% of ingredients produced by
conventional methods as long as those ingredients are not available
(e.g. exotic fruit) or in very short supply on the Community
organic market. Part C of Annex VI to Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91
lists the
ingredients concerned.
Products with an organic content of 70% to 95% may bear indications
referring to organic production methods only in the list of ingredients,
but not in the sales description. Indications referring to organic
production
methods in the list of ingredients may not be more prominent
than other indications in the list of ingredients. The percentage
of ingredients of organic origin must be specified.
Where the ingredients of organic origin represent less than 70%
of the content of a product, the labelling and advertising may
not bear any reference to organic production methods.
Community rules do, however, provide a possibility for referring
to the conversion period. Indications referring to conversion
to organic production methods may be used: crop products that
comply with the provisions of Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91, and
for which the
operator is subject to inspection measures, may bear the words
"product under conversion to organic farming", on condition
that a conversion period of at least twelve months has been complied
with before the harvest. The indications should not be such as
to mislead the consumer.
This faculty of referring to the conversion period is intended
to help producers changing over to organic production in a period
when the investment cost is usually heavy, by enabling them to
enhance the product image after the first year.
Logo and reference to inspection scheme
Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91, as amended by the Council in
1995, opened the way for the Commission to establish a special
logo for organic production and to prescribe wording explicitly
indicating that products are covered by the inspection scheme.
In March 2000, Commission Regulation (EC) No 331/2000 established
the logo, whose purpose is enhancement of the credibility of
organic products in the eyes of consumers and better identification
of such
products on the market.
The logo is not compulsory. Producers use it on a voluntary basis,
when their products fulfil the required conditions.
The logo and indication of inspection may be used only for certain
products covered by Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91, which meet all
the following conditions:
| · |
at
least 95% of the ingredients have been produced by organic methods; |
| · |
the
products have been subject to the inspection arrangements laid
down in the Regulation throughout the production and preparation
process; this means that the operators involved in the agricultural
production, processing, packaging and labelling of the product
must all be subject to the inspection scheme; |
| · |
the products are
sold directly by the producer or preparer in sealed packaging,
or placed on the market as pre-packaged foodstuffs; |
| · |
the products show
on the labelling the name and/or business name of the producer,
preparer or vendor, together with the name or code number of
the inspection authority or body. |
Regulation (EC) No 331/2000 also lays down conditions for the
presentation and use of the Community logo. The logo must match
the models in the annex to the Regulation. Moreover, the Community
logo and the wording there-upon must be used in accordance with
the technical reproduction rules in the graphic manual.
Inspection
In view of the importance
of maintaining the credibility of the organic farming sector,
the Regulation introduces a number of rules on the inspection
of operators.
Prior notification of activity to the competent
national authority (Article 8)
Any operator who produces, prepares or imports from a third
country goods produced in accordance with organic methods must
notify this activity to the competent authority of the Member
State in which the activity is carried out. The notification
must, among other things, enable the parcels cultivated by organic
methods to be identified, involve an explicit commitment by the
operator to comply with the provisions of the Regulation, and
include the name of the body responsible for supervising the
holding.
Special inspection scheme
The Regulation requires each Member State to set up an inspection
system operated by one or more designated inspection authorities
and/or by approved private bodies. For the application of a system
operated by private bodies, Member States must also designate
an authority responsible for the approval and supervision of
such bodies. That authority is required, among other things,
to supervise the inspection bodies, to ensure that they are able
to carry out the required inspections, guaranteeing that they
are effective and objective. Each Member State must ensure, either
through the authority or through the arrangements for accreditation,
that the private bodies meet the requirements of standard EN
45011 (or ISO 65). This standard, drawn up by the European Committee
for Standardisation (CEN), sets out the requirements to be met
by certification bodies to ensure sound and credible certification.
Inspection measures
All operators who, as part of a business activity, produce,
prepare or import agricultural products or food-stuffs obtained
by organic production methods are subject to a special inspection
scheme established by the
Member States. These schemes are governed by detailed minimum
requirements set out in particular in Annex III to Regulation
(EEC) No 2092/91.
· Inspection measures applicable to farmers
The inspection scheme requires the producer and the inspection
body to draw up a full description of the unit. In particular,
this description must make it possible to identify production
and storage premises, harvesting
areas, planned manure spreading and processing and/or packaging
premises (if any). The measures to be taken to ensure compliance
with Community regulations must also be described. Once this
report has been drawn up, the producer must notify the inspection
body each year
of its schedule of production of crop products, giving a breakdown
by parcel.
Detailed accounts must be kept to ensure optimum traceability.
Producers of organic products of animal origin must also keep
records providing a full description of the herd or flock management
system, with
details of livestock, by species, entering and leaving the holding,
of any animals lost, of feed, and of veterinary treatment.
If organic and conventional production take place on the same
holding, the producer must ensure that organic parcels and storage
premises are kept clearly separate from conventional areas. Where
crops or animals are raised organically, plants of the same variety,
or animals of the same breed, may not also be raised conventionally
on the same holding. The body inspects the entire holding, including
the premises and parcels used for conventional production.
The inspection body must inspect each holding at least once a
year, and may also visit farms without prior warning. Inspectors
must check on compliance with the rules, and may take samples
so as to test for the presence of unauthorised products.
· Preparation of foodstuffs from organic products
The same principles of identification, monitoring and record-keeping
apply to processing and packaging units. The principle of separate
premises for processing, storage and packaging also applies to
operators dealing with both organic and conventional ingredients.
· Importers of organic products
The rules for inspection of importers are also intended to supervise
the movements of each individual consignment of products imported
from third countries, in particular by requiring full identification
of products
(quantity, type, origin). The inspection body must be provided
with information on the transport and consignees of products.
· Sanctions for failure to comply with Community rules
When an inspection body finds an irregularity, the indications
are removed from the lots concerned, which means that the products
may not be described for sale as "organic". Stricter
penalties may be imposed where a manifest infringement or an
infringement with prolonged effects is found; in that case, the
operator may be prohibited from producing or marketing organic
products for a period to be determined by the inspection body.
Operators subject to the inspection scheme accept
the possibility of such sanctions when signing the contract with
the inspection body. The competent authority in each Member State
must keep itself informed of all irregularities and infringements
reported by private inspection bodies.
· Rules governing transport
Agricultural products being sold as organic may be transported
only in packaging or containers closed in a manner which would
prevent substitution of the content.
Other measures necessary to prevent fraudulent use of indications
referring to organic production methods
Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 provides that Member States must
take whatever measures and action are required to prevent fraudulent
use of the indications referring to organic production methods.
This provision
means that, where necessary, the authorities in each Member State
must take action in addition to the inspections carried out under
the special scheme.
Imports
Organic products from
third countries may be marketed as such only after a procedure
to ascertain the equivalence of the rules on organic agriculture
applied in the third country. Thus the rules applied in the third
country must provide guarantees equivalent to those provided
by Community rules. The purpose of this requirement is to guarantee
the credibility of the organic products market, and ensure fair
competition between Community and third country producers. Equivalence
is ascertained only where the products concerned are described
for marketing as "organic".
In order to ascertain equivalence, the Commission makes a thorough
investigation into the arrangements in the country concerned,
examining not only the requirements imposed on production but
also the measures
applied to ensure effective control. Where rules are found to
be equivalent, the third country is entered on the list of authorised
countries, which means that organic products from that country
can be imported and move freely within the European Union. The
list at present
comprises Argentina, Australia, the Czech Republic, Hungary,
Israel and Switzerland.
Imported consignments must be covered by an inspection certificate
issued by the competent authority or body in the third country,
attesting that the consignment has been produced in accordance
with the production and inspection rules recognised as equivalent.
A parallel scheme has been introduced, valid until 2005, to enable
Member States to issue import authorisations for consignments
from third countries not included in the Community list drawn
up by the Commission. It is up to the importer to prove that
the imported products
were obtained according to production rules equivalent to those
laid down in Community legislation and were subject to inspection
measures of equivalent effectiveness to the inspection measures
imposed on Community products. The Member State notifies the
Commission
and the other Member States of the third countries and products
for which it has issued an authorisation. This scheme is particularly
important for specific categories of goods inspected at local
or regional level, from countries where organic production is
not covered by national legislation or rules covering all organic
products (e.g. coffee or tea plantations in a particular country).
Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European
Communities, 2001
Authors: Gwénaëlle Le Guillou and Alberik Scharpé
The Commission is not bound by the text of this publication.
ISBN 92-894-0363-2
© European Communities, 2000
Reproduction authorised provided the source is acknowledged |
|